TradingAgentsvsVane
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TradingAgents | Vane | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 117 997 | 37 823 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 638 | +916 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 3 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.12.2 · 10 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 81/100 for Vane, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Vane.
If you want the quickest setup, Vane is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 638 stars in 30 days).
TradingAgents details →Vane details →