TradingAgentsvsUmami
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TradingAgents | Umami | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 117 967 | 39 759 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 608 | +763 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 13 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 85/100 for Umami, so it is the safer default.
Umami ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 608 stars in 30 days).
TradingAgents details →Umami details →