langflowvsUmami
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | Umami | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 156 112 | 39 753 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +921 | +772 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 13 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 85/100 for Umami, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Umami.
If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; langflow needs more configuration.
langflow details →Umami details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep Umami, compare it with