TradingAgentsvsTrilium Notes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TradingAgents | Trilium Notes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 117 704 | 38 601 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 345 | +645 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 14 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.106.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 83/100 for Trilium Notes, so it is the safer default.
Trilium Notes ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 345 stars in 30 days).
TradingAgents details →Trilium Notes details →