Tile38vswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Tile38 | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 8 in Geospatial | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 9 749 | 8 068 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +17 | +160 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 |
| Latest release | 1.38.0 · 9 Jun 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
woodpecker-ci scores 73/100 against 66/100 for Tile38, so it is the safer default.
woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Tile38.
If you want the quickest setup, Tile38 is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.
woodpecker-ci is growing faster right now (+160 stars in 30 days).
Tile38 details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep Tile38, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with