TeslaMatevsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| TeslaMate | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 9 202 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +166 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | v4.4.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Elixir | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
TeslaMate scores 74/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, TeslaMate is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
TeslaMate is growing faster right now (+166 stars in 30 days).
TeslaMate details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep TeslaMate, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with