Kia Uvo & Hyundai BluelinkvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Kia Uvo & Hyundai Bluelink | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #33 of 104 in Home Automation | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 977 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +39 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.21.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 59/100 for Kia Uvo & Hyundai Bluelink, so it is the safer default.
Kia Uvo & Hyundai Bluelink ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
If you want the quickest setup, Kia Uvo & Hyundai Bluelink is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
Kia Uvo & Hyundai Bluelink is growing faster right now (+39 stars in 30 days).
Kia Uvo & Hyundai Bluelink details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep Kia Uvo & Hyundai Bluelink, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with