LubeLoggervsTeslaMate
Two self-hosted Vehicle Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LubeLogger | TeslaMate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #1 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 924 | 9 199 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +68 | +168 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 | v4.4.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
TeslaMate scores 74/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.
LubeLogger ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for TeslaMate.
If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; TeslaMate needs more configuration.
TeslaMate is growing faster right now (+168 stars in 30 days).
LubeLogger details →TeslaMate details →All Vehicle Management projects →
Swap a project
Keep LubeLogger, compare it with
Keep TeslaMate, compare it with