TdarrvsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Tdarr | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 18 in Video Processing | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 4 369 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +37 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 |
| Latest release | — | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Makefile | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
Tdarr scores 66/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.
Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tdarr.
If you want the quickest setup, Tdarr is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
Tdarr is growing faster right now (+37 stars in 30 days).
Tdarr details →Urbit details →
Swap a project
Keep Tdarr, compare it with
Keep Urbit, compare it with