ConcatvsTdarr
Two self-hosted Video Processing projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Concat | Tdarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #2 of 18 in Video Processing |
| GitHub stars | 12 409 | 4 369 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 410 | +38 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Rust | Makefile |
Which one should you pick?
Concat scores 82/100 against 66/100 for Tdarr, so it is the safer default.
Concat ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tdarr.
Concat is growing faster right now (+2 410 stars in 30 days).
Concat details →Tdarr details →All Video Processing projects →
Swap a project
Keep Concat, compare it with
Keep Tdarr, compare it with