automatic-ripping-machinevsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automatic-ripping-machine | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 5 392 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 6 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
automatic-ripping-machine scores 67/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.
automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.
If you want the quickest setup, automatic-ripping-machine is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
automatic-ripping-machine is growing faster right now (+148 stars in 30 days).
automatic-ripping-machine details →Urbit details →