ConcatvsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Concat | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 12 510 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 511 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
Concat scores 82/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
Concat is growing faster right now (+2 511 stars in 30 days).
Concat details →Urbit details →
Swap a project
Keep Concat, compare it with
Keep Urbit, compare it with