Taskwarriorvstrigger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Taskwarrior | trigger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Productivity | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 6 140 | 16 653 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +254 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 51 |
| Latest release | v3.5.0 · 16 Aug 2026 | v4.8.2 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
trigger scores 76/100 against 68/100 for Taskwarrior, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 51 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Taskwarrior.
If you want the quickest setup, Taskwarrior is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.
trigger is growing faster right now (+254 stars in 30 days).
Taskwarrior details →trigger details →
Swap a project
Keep Taskwarrior, compare it with
Keep trigger, compare it with