Reactive Resumevstrigger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | trigger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 44 995 | 16 644 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 622 | +257 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 49 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 76/100 for trigger, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 34 for Reactive Resume.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 622 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →trigger details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep trigger, compare it with