openclawvstrigger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openclaw | trigger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 393 256 | 16 641 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 908 | +254 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 49 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 76/100 for trigger, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 37 for openclaw.
If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 908 stars in 30 days).
openclaw details →trigger details →
Swap a project
Keep openclaw, compare it with
Keep trigger, compare it with