SonarQubevsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SonarQube | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Code Review | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 11 125 | 89 750 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +103 | +2 411 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 17 |
| Latest release | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.
World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for SonarQube.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 411 stars in 30 days).
SonarQube details →World Monitor details →