pr-agentvsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| pr-agent | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in Code Review | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 13 687 | 89 750 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +544 | +2 411 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 17 |
| Latest release | v0.49.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 77/100 for pr-agent, so it is the safer default.
pr-agent ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for World Monitor.
If you want the quickest setup, pr-agent is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 411 stars in 30 days).
pr-agent details →World Monitor details →