skyvernvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| skyvern | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 26 in Automation | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 23 295 | 8 652 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +232 | +153 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.0.56 · 14 Oct 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
skyvern scores 75/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
skyvern ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; skyvern needs more configuration.
skyvern details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep skyvern, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with