openclawvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openclaw | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 393 256 | 8 651 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 908 | +156 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 1 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; openclaw needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 908 stars in 30 days).
openclaw details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep openclaw, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with