paperclipvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| paperclip | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 108 237 | 8 650 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +26 873 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 1 |
| Latest release | v2026.1012.0 · 12 Oct 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
paperclip scores 88/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
paperclip ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; paperclip needs more configuration.
paperclip is growing faster right now (+26 873 stars in 30 days).
paperclip details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep paperclip, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with