Scada-LTSvsWindowsinDocker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Scada-LTS | WindowsinDocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 1 019 | 53 715 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +330 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
WindowsinDocker ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+330 stars in 30 days).
Scada-LTS details →WindowsinDocker details →
Swap a project
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with
Keep WindowsinDocker, compare it with