EMQXvsWindowsinDocker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| EMQX | WindowsinDocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Messaging | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 16 868 | 53 714 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +114 | +329 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 11 |
| Latest release | 6.3.2 · 16 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Erlang | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 78/100 for EMQX, so it is the safer default.
EMQX ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for WindowsinDocker.
If you want the quickest setup, WindowsinDocker is easier to run; EMQX needs more configuration.
WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+329 stars in 30 days).
EMQX details →WindowsinDocker details →