LinuxCNCvsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted Industrial IoT projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LinuxCNC | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 2 512 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +11 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.9.10 · 3 Jul 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
LinuxCNC scores 64/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
LinuxCNC ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
If you want the quickest setup, Scada-LTS is easier to run; LinuxCNC needs more configuration.
LinuxCNC is growing faster right now (+11 stars in 30 days).
LinuxCNC details →Scada-LTS details →All Industrial IoT projects →
Swap a project
Keep LinuxCNC, compare it with
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with