RustFSvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| RustFS | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Storage | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 35 527 | 8 654 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 695 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 1 |
| Latest release | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
RustFS scores 74/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
RustFS ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.
RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 695 stars in 30 days).
RustFS details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep RustFS, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with