automqvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automq | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 12 in Message Broker | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 10 919 | 8 654 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +61 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 1 |
| Latest release | 1.7.4 · 29 Aug 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
automq scores 68/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
automq ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; automq needs more configuration.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).
automq details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep automq, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with