glusterfsvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| glusterfs | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 5 266 | 8 654 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 63/100 for glusterfs, so it is the safer default.
Workout.cool ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for glusterfs.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; glusterfs needs more configuration.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).
glusterfs details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep glusterfs, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with