RustFSvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| RustFS | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Storage | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 35 502 | 24 045 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 770 | +785 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 11 |
| Latest release | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 83/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.
RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 770 stars in 30 days).
RustFS details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep RustFS, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with