automqvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automq | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 12 in Message Broker | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 10 921 | 24 053 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +63 | +775 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 |
| Latest release | 1.7.4 · 29 Aug 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 68/100 for automq, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for automq.
temporal is growing faster right now (+775 stars in 30 days).
automq details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep automq, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with