RustFSvsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| RustFS | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Storage | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 35 499 | 95 252 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 767 | +2 339 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 25 |
| Latest release | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.
If you want the quickest setup, Stirling-PDF is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.
RustFS details →Stirling-PDF details →
Swap a project
Keep RustFS, compare it with
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with