glusterfsvsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| glusterfs | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 266 | 95 266 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +2 353 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 25 |
| Latest release | — | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 63/100 for glusterfs, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for glusterfs.
If you want the quickest setup, Stirling-PDF is easier to run; glusterfs needs more configuration.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 353 stars in 30 days).
glusterfs details →Stirling-PDF details →
Swap a project
Keep glusterfs, compare it with
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with