RustDesk ServervsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| RustDesk Server | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 22 in Remote Desktop | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 10 631 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +175 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.1.16 · 20 Jul 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
RustDesk Server scores 74/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
RustDesk Server ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, RustDesk Server is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.
RustDesk Server is growing faster right now (+175 stars in 30 days).
RustDesk Server details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep RustDesk Server, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with