rpi-mqtt-monitorvsVert
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rpi-mqtt-monitor | Vert | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #2 of 10 in File Conversion |
| GitHub stars | 328 | 16 174 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +541 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 0 |
| Latest release | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Vert scores 71/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.
rpi-mqtt-monitor ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Vert.
If you want the quickest setup, Vert is easier to run; rpi-mqtt-monitor needs more configuration.
Vert is growing faster right now (+541 stars in 30 days).
rpi-mqtt-monitor details →Vert details →
Swap a project
Keep rpi-mqtt-monitor, compare it with
Keep Vert, compare it with