rpi-mqtt-monitorvssignoz
Two self-hosted Monitoring & observability projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rpi-mqtt-monitor | signoz | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #7 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 328 | 32 473 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +298 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 38 |
| Latest release | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 | v0.148.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
signoz scores 79/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.
signoz ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for rpi-mqtt-monitor.
signoz is growing faster right now (+298 stars in 30 days).
rpi-mqtt-monitor details →signoz details →All Monitoring & observability projects →
Swap a project
Keep rpi-mqtt-monitor, compare it with
Keep signoz, compare it with