Request TrackervsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Request Tracker | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Helpdesk | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 1 164 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 6 |
| Latest release | rt-5.0.10 · 1 Jun 2026 | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Perl | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
Request Tracker scores 65/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.
Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Request Tracker.
Request Tracker details →Urbit details →
Swap a project
Keep Request Tracker, compare it with
Keep Urbit, compare it with