UrbitvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Urbit | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Operating System | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 3 622 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 0 |
| Latest release | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | hoon | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Zammad scores 70/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.
Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
Zammad is growing faster right now (+103 stars in 30 days).
Urbit details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep Urbit, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with