Request TrackervsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Request Tracker | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Helpdesk | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 1 164 | 17 185 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | rt-5.0.10 · 1 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Perl | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 65/100 for Request Tracker, so it is the safer default.
Request Tracker ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Request Tracker needs more configuration.
Request Tracker is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
Request Tracker details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep Request Tracker, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with