UpptimevsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Upptime | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 17 185 | 6 053 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +101 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Markdown | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Zammad scores 70/100 against 69/100 for Upptime, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
Zammad is growing faster right now (+101 stars in 30 days).
Upptime details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep Upptime, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with