QGIS Web ClientvsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| QGIS Web Client | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 12 in Maps | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 383 | 47 726 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +19 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; QGIS Web Client needs more configuration.
Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+19 stars in 30 days).
QGIS Web Client details →Text Generation WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep QGIS Web Client, compare it with
Keep Text Generation WebUI, compare it with