QGIS Web ClientvsResume-Matcher
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| QGIS Web Client | Resume-Matcher | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 12 in Maps | #1 of 12 in Document Processing |
| GitHub stars | 383 | 28 926 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +412 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 5 |
| Latest release | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.4.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Resume-Matcher scores 81/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.
QGIS Web Client ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Resume-Matcher.
If you want the quickest setup, Resume-Matcher is easier to run; QGIS Web Client needs more configuration.
Resume-Matcher is growing faster right now (+412 stars in 30 days).
QGIS Web Client details →Resume-Matcher details →
Swap a project
Keep QGIS Web Client, compare it with
Keep Resume-Matcher, compare it with