QGIS Web ClientvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| QGIS Web Client | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 12 in Maps | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 383 | 45 072 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 671 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 35 |
| Latest release | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QGIS Web Client.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; QGIS Web Client needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 671 stars in 30 days).
QGIS Web Client details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep QGIS Web Client, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with