quackbackvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| quackback | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 14 in Customer Support | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 331 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.14.1 · 7 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 50/100 for quackback, so it is the safer default.
quackback ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
If you want the quickest setup, quackback is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
quackback details →Windows ARM details →