quackbackvsVert
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| quackback | Vert | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 14 in Customer Support | #2 of 10 in File Conversion |
| GitHub stars | 331 | 16 176 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +543 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.14.1 · 7 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Vert scores 71/100 against 50/100 for quackback, so it is the safer default.
quackback ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Vert.
If you want the quickest setup, Vert is easier to run; quackback needs more configuration.
Vert is growing faster right now (+543 stars in 30 days).
quackback details →Vert details →