quackbackvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| quackback | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 14 in Customer Support | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 331 | 35 795 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +834 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 28 |
| Latest release | v0.14.1 · 7 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 50/100 for quackback, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for quackback.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+834 stars in 30 days).
quackback details →SeaweedFS details →