AnswervsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Answer | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 15 702 | 35 798 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +837 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 28 |
| Latest release | v2.0.3 · 22 Sept 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 71/100 for Answer, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Answer.
If you want the quickest setup, Answer is easier to run; SeaweedFS needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+837 stars in 30 days).
Answer details →SeaweedFS details →