QFieldCloudvsstable-diffusion-webui
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| QFieldCloud | stable-diffusion-webui | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 89/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Mapping & GPS | #1 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 246 | 165 170 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +79 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v26.29 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
stable-diffusion-webui scores 89/100 against 54/100 for QFieldCloud, so it is the safer default.
QFieldCloud ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for stable-diffusion-webui.
If you want the quickest setup, stable-diffusion-webui is easier to run; QFieldCloud needs more configuration.
stable-diffusion-webui is growing faster right now (+79 stars in 30 days).
QFieldCloud details →stable-diffusion-webui details →
Swap a project
Keep QFieldCloud, compare it with
Keep stable-diffusion-webui, compare it with