Project OSRMvsQFieldCloud
Two self-hosted Mapping & GPS projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Project OSRM | QFieldCloud | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Mapping & GPS | #4 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 8 179 | 246 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +76 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 10 |
| Latest release | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 | v26.29 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Project OSRM scores 69/100 against 54/100 for QFieldCloud, so it is the safer default.
Project OSRM ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QFieldCloud.
Project OSRM is growing faster right now (+76 stars in 30 days).
Project OSRM details →QFieldCloud details →All Mapping & GPS projects →
Swap a project
Keep Project OSRM, compare it with
Keep QFieldCloud, compare it with