God's Eye ViewvsQFieldCloud
Two self-hosted Mapping & GPS projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| God's Eye View | QFieldCloud | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Mapping & GPS | #4 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 60 862 | 246 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 306 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.3.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v26.29 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
God's Eye View scores 83/100 against 54/100 for QFieldCloud, so it is the safer default.
QFieldCloud ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for God's Eye View.
If you want the quickest setup, God's Eye View is easier to run; QFieldCloud needs more configuration.
God's Eye View is growing faster right now (+2 306 stars in 30 days).
God's Eye View details →QFieldCloud details →All Mapping & GPS projects →
Swap a project
Keep God's Eye View, compare it with
Keep QFieldCloud, compare it with