osTicketvsPostgREST
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| osTicket | PostgREST | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Helpdesk | #2 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 3 998 | 27 735 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +75 | +58 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 20 |
| Latest release | v1.18.4 · 17 Jun 2026 | v16.5 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Haskell |
Which one should you pick?
PostgREST scores 79/100 against 66/100 for osTicket, so it is the safer default.
PostgREST ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for osTicket.
If you want the quickest setup, PostgREST is easier to run; osTicket needs more configuration.
osTicket details →PostgREST details →
Swap a project
Keep osTicket, compare it with
Keep PostgREST, compare it with