openHop RepeatervsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openHop Repeater | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Network | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 298 | 95 261 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 348 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 25 |
| Latest release | 1.1.4 · 8 Sept 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 51/100 for openHop Repeater, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for openHop Repeater.
If you want the quickest setup, Stirling-PDF is easier to run; openHop Repeater needs more configuration.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 348 stars in 30 days).
openHop Repeater details →Stirling-PDF details →
Swap a project
Keep openHop Repeater, compare it with
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with