openHop RepeatervsProject N.O.M.A.D.
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openHop Repeater | Project N.O.M.A.D. | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Network | #1 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 298 | 41 160 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 946 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 8 |
| Latest release | 1.1.4 · 8 Sept 2026 | v1.35.1 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Project N.O.M.A.D. scores 85/100 against 51/100 for openHop Repeater, so it is the safer default.
Project N.O.M.A.D. ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for openHop Repeater.
If you want the quickest setup, Project N.O.M.A.D. is easier to run; openHop Repeater needs more configuration.
Project N.O.M.A.D. is growing faster right now (+2 946 stars in 30 days).
openHop Repeater details →Project N.O.M.A.D. details →
Swap a project
Keep openHop Repeater, compare it with
Keep Project N.O.M.A.D., compare it with